8 December 2025
When it comes to sports, especially in leagues like the NFL, NBA, or even the NHL, the draft is one of the most exciting and nerve-wracking times of the year. It’s that magical moment when teams take a gamble, hoping they’ve found the next star player to lead them to glory. But here’s the thing: it’s not just about scouting reports, combine stats, or highlight reels. Behind every draft pick, there’s a coach pulling strings, influencing the decision-making process. The impact of coaching on draft selections is bigger than most people realize.
So, how much influence do coaches really have when it comes to who gets drafted? Let’s break it down.

Think about it like this: If the GM is the architect designing the house, the coach is the interior designer deciding how the rooms should look and function. Sure, the GM can draft the most talented player available, but if that player doesn’t fit the coach’s scheme, it’s like putting a couch in the middle of a kitchen. It just doesn’t work.
Coaches understand their system better than anyone else. They know what type of players can thrive in their game plan—whether it’s a mobile quarterback, a speedy winger, or a three-and-D basketball player. So, they have a strong say in who gets drafted. In some cases, they even have more influence than the GM, especially if they’ve already proven themselves as a successful coach.
Belichick has often been criticized for some of his draft choices, but there’s no denying that his influence over the draft has played a significant role in building one of the most successful dynasties in NFL history. He values versatility, intelligence, and coachability over raw athletic talent, which might explain some of his more unconventional draft picks.
Take the NFL, for example. A college quarterback who thrives in a spread offense might not be the best fit for a team that runs a West Coast offense. Sure, they might be talented, but if they can’t adapt to the new system, they’ll likely struggle. Coaches know this, which is why they push hard for players who fit their scheme, even if they’re not the most hyped-up prospects.
It’s like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. You might be able to force it, but it won’t work as smoothly as finding the right piece for the puzzle.
That’s why coaches like Steve Kerr of the Golden State Warriors or Erik Spoelstra of the Miami Heat are so involved in the draft process. They need players who can thrive in their up-tempo, three-point-heavy systems. So, when the front office is deciding between two prospects, you better believe the coach is going to push for the player that fits their vision.

Coaches often see potential where others don’t. They might push for a raw, unpolished prospect because they believe in their ability to mold that player into a star. This is particularly true in professional leagues like the NBA, where “project” players are often drafted based on their long-term potential rather than immediate impact.
Popovich has a knack for identifying players who might not be the most polished, but who have the right mindset and work ethic to develop into stars. His influence on the Spurs’ draft selections has been instrumental in keeping the team competitive for over two decades.
A GM might be wowed by a player’s physical attributes, but the coach is the one who has to manage that player day in and day out. If a prospect has a reputation for being a locker room cancer, a coach will likely advise against drafting them, no matter how talented they are. Coaches know that team chemistry is just as important as on-field talent.
So, when it came to draft picks, Jackson was heavily involved in the process. He knew that his system required a specific type of player, and he wasn’t afraid to push for those who fit his philosophy, even if they weren’t the most hyped prospects coming out of college.
Then there’s the issue of short-term thinking. Coaches are often under pressure to win now, which can lead them to push for players who can make an immediate impact, rather than prospects with higher long-term potential. This can create tension between the coach and the GM, who might be more focused on building for the future.
However, it’s a delicate balance. Too much influence from a coach can lead to short-term thinking or biased decisions. The best organizations are the ones where the coach and GM work together, combining the coach's understanding of the team’s needs with the GM’s long-term vision.
So, the next time you’re watching the draft and wondering why your favorite team passed on the top-rated prospect, remember: there’s probably a coach in the background, pulling some strings.
all images in this post were generated using AI tools
Category:
Draft PicksAuthor:
Onyx Frye